Lido Capital Corp. v. Eskelsen
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSteinbrink, J.
The plaintiff sues to recover on an assigned claim for goods sold and delivered to the defendant. Both sides move for summary judgment upon the basis of a stipulation of facts which disclose that the goods sold and delivered consisted of intoxicating beverages containing more than one-half of one per cent of alcohol by volume; that the sale and delivery were made while the Eighteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United *324States was still in'force; that neither the plaintiff nor its assignor, nor the defendant, were licensed to transport, deliver, furnish or possess any intoxicating…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Curtis and Others v. . LeavittNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
- Reiner v. North American Newspaper AllianceNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Goodrich v. . HoughtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Central Bank v. Empire Stone Dressing Co.New York Supreme Court · 1857
- Washburn v. FranklinNew York Supreme Court · 1861
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Fitzsimons v. Eagle Brewing Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
- W. L. Hailey & Co. v. County of NiagaraCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- Bologna Brothers v. MorrisseyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1963
- Government of French Republic v. CabotNew York Supreme Court · 1947
- Licznerski v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1949
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.