Legal Opinion

Berkowitz v. Dam

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1923PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cropsey. J.

When a judgment was obtained against one Max Soicher he was the owner of the property in question. This judgment was entered in the Municipal Court in the borough of Manhattan. Thereafter that judgment was docketed in New York county under the name of Max Sorcher instead of Max Soicher. Still later, but while Soicher remained the owner of the property, which is located in Kings county, the said judgment was docketed in Kings county under the name of Sorcher, instead of Soicher. A week later Soicher conveyed the property to defendant Wasserman. About two years later the sheriff,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hayes v. . NourseNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Davidson v. CrooksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  3. Dixon v. DixonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
  4. Jospe v. DanisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
  5. H. R. & C. Co. v. SmithNew York Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hamelin v. ETNA Abstract Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Martino v. KodacskaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API