Legal Opinion

Davidson v. Crooks

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 15, 1899PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Submission of a controversy upon an agreed statement, of facts, pursuant to section 1279 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

1Opinion of the Court

Ingraham, J.:

The plaintiff in this action, being the owner and in possession of a piece of land now located in the city of New York, executed á contract whereby she agreed to convey to the defendant, and the defendant agreed to purchase, the said land.. On the day named for the delivery of the conveyance, the plaintiff tendered to the defendant a conveyance, duly executed, sufficient to convey the premises to the defendant. The defendant refused to accept the deed for the reason that the title tendered was not marketable, and the question submitted is whether the conveyance tendered would…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Frank v. Berlin (In Re Frank)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1984
  2. Dixon v. DixonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
  3. Jefferson v. BangsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
  4. Berkowitz v. DamNew York Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Opn. No., New York Attorney General Reports1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API