Legal Opinion

H. R. & C. Co. v. Smith

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1923PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Action to bar judgment as a lien on real estate.

1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.

The question presented is whether a default judgment docketed against Bess Hedges is notice to subsequent purchasers of real estate, title to which was in Mary Elizabeth Hedges.

The judgment was docketed on July 6, 1916, in the office of the clerk of the county of Kings. On July 12, 1916, an action was instituted for the foreclosure of a mortgage covering the premises formerly owned by Mary Elizabeth Hedges. The foreclosure proceeded to judgment, a sale was had, and the referee’s deed recorded January 29, 1917. The premises were conveyed to the plaintiffs.

The relief sought is that the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Johnson v. HessIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  2. First National Bank v. Hacoda Mercantile Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  3. Davis v. SteepsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Wicker v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908
  5. Turk v. BensonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Berkowitz v. DamNew York Supreme Court · 1923
  2. H. R. & C. Co. v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API