Legal Opinion

Bowers v. Alamo Rent-A-Car, Inc.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1998No. 20273PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NAKAYAMA, Justice.

Defendant-appellant Alamo Rent-a-car, Inc. appeals from a ruling of the circuit court granting partial summary judgment in favor of plaintiffs-appellees Charles Bowers and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company in this declaratory judgment action. The circuit court ruled that: (1) the escape clause contained in the Alamo rental agreement was void; (2) Alamo has the primary obligation to defend and indemnify Bowers against claims for personal injury and property damage incurred while driving an Alamo vehicle; and (3) State Farm’s obligation was limited to providing…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. State v. ArceoHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. OrtizHawaii Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. KaakimakaHawaii Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Mathewson v. Aloha Airlines, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Enterprise Leasing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1996

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Schefke v. Reliable Collection Agency, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Morgan v. Planning Department, County of KauaiHawaii Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Shelter Mutual Insurance Co. v. Mid-Century Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2011
  4. Carlisle v. One (1) BoatHawaii Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Kawauchi v. TabataHawaii Supreme Court · 1966

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API