Bowers v. Alamo Rent-A-Car, Inc.
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
NAKAYAMA, Justice.
Defendant-appellant Alamo Rent-a-car, Inc. appeals from a ruling of the circuit court granting partial summary judgment in favor of plaintiffs-appellees Charles Bowers and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company in this declaratory judgment action. The circuit court ruled that: (1) the escape clause contained in the Alamo rental agreement was void; (2) Alamo has the primary obligation to defend and indemnify Bowers against claims for personal injury and property damage incurred while driving an Alamo vehicle; and (3) State Farm’s obligation was limited to providing…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- State v. ArceoHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. OrtizHawaii Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. KaakimakaHawaii Supreme Court · 1997
- Mathewson v. Aloha Airlines, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1996
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Enterprise Leasing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1996
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Schefke v. Reliable Collection Agency, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2001
- Morgan v. Planning Department, County of KauaiHawaii Supreme Court · 2004
- Shelter Mutual Insurance Co. v. Mid-Century Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2011
- Carlisle v. One (1) BoatHawaii Supreme Court · 2008
- Kawauchi v. TabataHawaii Supreme Court · 1966
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.