Legal Opinion

Ombrello v. Duluth, South Shore & Atlantic Railway Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1930No. Docket No. 8, Calendar No. 34,831PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.

The bill is a direct attack on a proceeding in the probate court of Marquette county approving settlement of a claim of plaintiff, an infant, against defendant, and it seeks to set aside the order of the probate court and settlement pursuant thereto. The bill was dismissed. Plaintiff has appealed.

Gruiseppi Ombrello, the duly appointed and qualified guardian of the estate of the infant, filed in the probate court his petition:

“State op Michigan — Probate court for Marquette county.
“In the Matter of the Estate of
“Frank Ombrello, a Minor.
“Your petitioner, Guiseppi Ombrello, guardian of Frank…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Chapin v. ChapinMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Morford v. DieffenbackerMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Metzner v. NewmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Thompson v. ThompsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Carroll v. Atlantic Steel Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1921

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Centala v. NavrudeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. Beatty v. BrookingMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  3. Handley v. MortlandWashington Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Kita v. MatuszakMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
  5. Morris v. BarkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1931

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API