Legal Opinion
Flower v. King
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided August 4, 1933No. 29,140PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLT, Justice.
Defendants appeal from the order denying their motion in the alternative for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial.
The action is to recover rent, defendants having rented the second floor of a business block in Hibbing, Minnesota, from Joseph Flower, the owner. The lease was in writing and ran from January 1, 1926, to January 1, 1931. The rent was $300 per month. The action was begun by Joseph Flower, the lessor, who died subsequent to the appeal. The special administratrix of his estate has been substituted as plaintiff.
The following facts gave rise to the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cullen v. Minnesota Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- Orr v. BennettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
- Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Co. v. WestSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- Gustafson v. KoehlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- Thiem v. EckertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Jimmerson v. Troy Seed Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- Wilcox v. SchlonerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
- Gates v. HerbergerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
- State v. SpragueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
- Katzmarek v. Weber Brokerage Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.