Legal Opinion
United States for an Order Authorizing the Roving Interception of Oral Communications v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 18, 2003No. 02-15635PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
349 F.3d 1132
In the Matter of the Application of the UNITED STATES FOR AN ORDER AUTHORIZING THE ROVING INTERCEPTION OF ORAL COMMUNICATIONS,
The Company, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
No. 02-15635.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted December 2, 2002.
Filed November 18, 2003.
Bennee B. Jones, Andrews & Kurth LLP, Dallas, Texas, for the appellant.
Eric Johnson, Senior Litigation Counsel, and Kathleen Bliss, Assistant United States Attorney, Organized Crime Strike Force, Office of the United States Attorney, Las Vegas, Nevada, for the appellee.
Appeal…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- United States v. New York Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Estate of Cowart v. Nicklos Drilling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Dalia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Sullivan v. StroopSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Speyer v. Avis Rent a Car System, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2005
- Benjamin Joffe v. Google Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Marek S. RadomskiCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- In re the United StatesDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2015