State v. Merrill
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtRusso, J.
Defendant-appellant, Bruce A. Merrill (defendant), appeals his conviction for grand theft, a violation of R.C. 2913.02. For the reasons adduced below, the judgment is reversed.
I
At 9:15 p.m., June 16, 1982, Officer Joseph Hamar received a radio broadcast directing him to respond to a person wanting to report a crime. Fifteen minutes later, the officer and his partner, Patrolman Jack Smith, arrived at 1266 West 116th Street, the home of Mrs. Lehmann. There, they spoke with Mr. Thurman Buckley who reported that his automobile, a 1979 Mercury Cougar, had been stolen. Officer Hamar testified that…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. ThompsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
- Torres v. Concrete Designs, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2019
- State v. DickessOhio Court of Appeals · 2008
- State v. BarnettOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
- State v. Betts, Unpublished Decision (10-18-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.