Legal Opinion

Timmer v. Talbot

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided December 16, 1935No. 3703PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAYMOND, District Judge.

The parties have submitted to the court the question of the constitutionality of Act No. 18 of the Extra Session of the Michigan Legislature held in 1934. They concede that the right of the trustee to recover is largely dependent upon alleged invalidity of the chattel mortgage sale under which defendant Lemmen claims title to the property in dispute. Process was not served on defendant Talbot, and the case as to him has been dismissed. Plaintiff asserts that the mortgage was void as against creditors because of noncompliance with the provisions of Act No. 18.

The…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. GarrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Michigan Central Railroad v. PowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  3. Link v. Receivers of Seaboard Air Line Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1934
  4. Kentucky-Tennessee Light & Power Co. v. City of Paris, Tenn.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1931
  5. Mather v. MacLaughlinDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1932

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Timmer v. TalbotDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1936
  2. State Tax Commission v. PreeceUtah Supreme Court · 1954
  3. State Tax Commission v. PreeceUtah Supreme Court · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API