Legal Opinion

Kentucky-Tennessee Light & Power Co. v. City of Paris, Tenn.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 8, 1931No. 5635, 5636PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DENISON, Circuit Judge.

The city of Paris, Tenn. — hereafter called the city — owned and operated electric light and water plants, with the necessary distribution systems, for supplying itself and its citizens. Its governing body decidéd to sell the combined plant for private operation. Byrd, purporting to act in his own interest, but with the declared intention of making a transfer to an operating company, negotiated and closed a contract which gave him a lease, an operating franchise, and a contract to buy. Later, he made such transfer, and, with the consent of the city, the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Pitts v. Nashville Baseball ClubTennessee Supreme Court · 1912
  2. City of Princeton v. Princeton Electric Light & Power Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  3. Los Angeles City Water Co. v. City of Los AngelesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California · 1898
  4. Tennessee Coal, Iron & R. v. HooperTennessee Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Grand River Dam Authority v. JarvisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
  2. American Ins. Co. v. LucasDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1941
  3. City of Muscatine v. WatersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977
  4. Pitcairn v. RumseyDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1940
  5. Sterling Drug, Inc. v. AndersonDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1954

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API