State ex rel. Rolling Hills Local School District Board of Education v. Brown
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Appellees argue that Rolling Hills could file a complaint under R.C. 5715.19 to challenge the assessment of these parcels and, therefore, have an adequate remedy at law. Rolling Hills replies that this statute is not as broad as appellees maintain. It contends that a board of education may contest only the current value of the property under the statute. We agree with appellees.
R.C. 5713.01 authorizes the county auditor to assess all real estate in his county. Under the statute, the auditor views and appraises each lot or parcel and places the correct value of each property on his tax list…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State ex rel. Corron v. WisnerOhio Supreme Court · 1971
3Cited by10 opinions
- Cincinnati School District Board of Education v. Hamilton County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- State ex rel. City of Lorain v. StewartOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- Cincinnati School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. Hamilton Cty. Bd. of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- Board of Education v. Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- Weathersfield Township v. Trumbull County Budget CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.