Legal Opinion

Berland v. Employment Security Department

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 12, 1988No. 16665-4-IPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Andersen, J. *

Facts of Case

At issue in this case is whether RCW 50.44.050, the statute declaring substitute teachers with assurance of reemployment ineligible for unemployment compensation benefits during holiday periods, is unconstitutional. This issue arises in the context of a substitute teacher who collected $138 in unemployment compensation benefits for a Christmas vacation period contrary to law. He was ordered to repay it and appeals.

Sidney Berland, the plaintiff herein, was employed as a substitute teacher in the Seattle public schools during the 1981-82 academic year. In June 1982…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. In Re RosierWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Ancheta v. DalyWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  3. State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Aetna Life Insurance v. Washington Life & Disability Insurance Guaranty Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Standow v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1977

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Evans v. Employment Security DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
  2. Thomas v. Employment Security DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  3. Belling v. Wash. State Emp't SEC. Dep'tWashington Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Pechman v. Employment Security DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
  5. Belling v. Wash. State Emp't SEC. Dep'tWashington Supreme Court · 2018

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API