Legal Opinion
Tyger Construction Co. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided February 18, 1994No. Nos. 468-88C, 526-88C and 90-134CPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NETTESHEIM, Judge.
This case is before the court after trial. The claims that were tried involved the mechanical portion of a construction contract between Tyger Construction Co., Inc. (“plaintiff’), and the Food and Drug Administration (the “FDA”), an agency of the United States Department of Health and Human Services (“DHHS”), for an Animal Testing *181Facility in Beltsville, Maryland.1 Plaintiff was the prime contractor in the project and seeks recovery on behalf of itself and one of its subcontractors. In reviewing the testimony and documentary and physical evidence, the court deems…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Powell v. McCormackSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. SpearinSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Contract Cleaning Maintenance, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Lisbon Contractors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Dawco Construction, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- George Sollitt Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- SIPCO Services & Marine Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
- R.P. Wallace, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Fru-Con Construction Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
- Laforge & Budd Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.