Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Wurst v. Pruyn

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided June 30, 1967No. 48425PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUMMERS, Justice.

Edward H. Wurst and his wife Gloria T. Wurst instituted these proceedings on May 2, 1962 for the loss they allegedly incurred, amounting to $27,445, when the dwelling house constructed for them by defendants fell into ruin. The defendants are Clarence S. Pruyn, Clarence S. Pruyn, Jr. and Thomas R. Pruyn, as individuals; Pruyn Realty Co. and Pruyn and Pruyn Construction Company, commercial partnerships; and Pruyn Realty Co., Inc. and Pruyn and Pruyn Construction Co., Inc., domestic corporations.

According to the record, the Pruyns, before incorporating their businesses, were…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Brasher v. City of AlexandriaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1949
  2. Jung v. GwinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1932
  3. Draube v. RiethLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1959
  4. Matthews v. RudyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1926
  5. Powell v. MarkhamSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1866

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. George B. Gilmore Co. v. GarrettMississippi Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Davidge v. H & H CONST. CO.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1983
  3. Groff v. Pete Kingsley Building, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Aizpurua v. Crane Pool Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1984
  5. Duhon v. Three Friends Homebuilders Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1981

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API