Legal Opinion
State v. Stengel
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 20, 1984No. 12258PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Per curiam
The sole issue in this appeal is whether the trial court abused its discretion in denying the plaintiff’s claim for interest after it had resolved the principal claim in the plaintiff’s behalf. The plaintiff, the state of Connecticut, brought an action against Robert F. Stengel, Administrator for the estate of Melvin Michaels, to recover for goods and services furnished Michaels at a veterans’ home in Rocky Hill. After the trial court had rendered its judgment for the plaintiff, the plaintiff filed a motion for further articulation of judgment in which it sought to recover costs, counsel fees…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bertozzi v. McCarthySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Selleck v. FrenchSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1814
- Wells Laundry & Linen Supply Co. v. Acme Fast Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- Gallicchio Bros., Inc. v. C & S OIL CO.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- H. B. Toms Tree Surgery, Inc. v. BrantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Westport Taxi Service, Inc. v. Westport Transit DistrictSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Prime Management Company, Incorporated, Cross-Appellee v. John F. Steinegger and Nancy J. Steinegger, D/B/A Franz Melzer Associates, Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Guaranty Bank & Trust Co. v. DowlingConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
- O'Hara v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Town of Newington v. General Sanitation Service Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.