Legal Opinion

City of Bozeman v. Taylen

Montana Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 2007No. DA 06-0364PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Warner

¶1 Appellants William and Deana Taylen (Taylens), appearing pro se, appeal two orders from the Eighteenth Judicial District Court, Gallatin County, granting the City of Bozeman’s (the City) motions for preliminary condemnation and immediate possession. We affirm.

¶2 The Taylens raise the following issues on appeal:

¶3 1. Did the District Court err in finding that the City of Bozeman made an offer to purchase their property before proceeding with condemnation, as required by § 70-30-111(4), MCA?

¶4 2. Did the District Court err in granting the City of Bozeman immediate possession of the Taylens’…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ray v. NanselMontana Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Sunburst Oil & Gas Co. v. NevilleMontana Supreme Court · 1927
  3. McClure v. State Compensation Insurance FundMontana Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Montana Power Co. v. CharterMontana Supreme Court · 1976

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Olsen v. JohnstonMontana Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Maldonado v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Henesh v. Board of CommissionersMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Knutson v. SchroederMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Plains Grains Ltd. Partnership v. Board of County CommissionersMontana Supreme Court · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API