Vinson v. Wooten
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Hart, J.,
(after stating the facts). The established rule in this State is that, where both parties request a peremptory instruction and do nothing more, they thereby assume the facts to be undisputed and, in effect, submit to the trial court the determination of the inference proper'to be drawn from them.
The circuit court’s decision, as evidenced by its instruction to the jury, that it render a verdict for the defendant, was a finding of fact, which concluded both parties .as effectually as if the same fact had been 'found by the jury. St. L. S. W. Ry. Co. v. Mulkey, 100 Ark. 71; St. L. I. M.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. MulkeySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
- St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. IngramSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
- Nalle v. GatesTexas Supreme Court · 1857
- National Benevolent Society v. BarkerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
- Watkins v. Louisiana State Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Gannon v. BronstonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
- Hunt v. McIlroy Bank and TrustCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1981
- Wilkinson v. FeildDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1952
- Oregon Short Line Railroad v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1925
- Missouri Pacific Railroad v. SwaffordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.