Legal Opinion

Commercial Bank v. Strong

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided February 15, 1856PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Assumpsit against the defendant as an endorser of a bill of exchange, drawn by the Rutland & Washington Railroad Company, by George W. Strong, president, upon, and accepted by the treasurer of that company, dated at the office of the R. & W. R. Co., West Poultney, and made payable to the order of Eastman & Page, at the American Exchange Bank, New York, endorsed by Eastman & Page, John Bradley, George W. Strong, J. W. Baldwin, and M. Clark.

Read the full summary

Assumpsit against the defendant as an endorser of a bill of exchange, drawn by the Rutland & Washington Railroad Company, by George W. Strong, president, upon, and accepted by the treasurer of that company, dated at the office of the R. & W. R. Co., West Poultney, and made payable to the order of Eastman & Page, at the American Exchange Bank, New York, endorsed by Eastman & Page, John Bradley, George W. Strong, J. W. Baldwin, and M. Clark. Plea, the general issue; trial by the court, September Term, 1855, — Piereoint, J., presiding. The drawing, acceptance, endorsements, presentment,…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Redfield, Ch. J.

This is an action upon a bill or draft against the defendant, as endorser. The only question made in the case is in regard to the proof of notice of dishonor to the defendant. The case being tried in the court below, without the intervention of the jury, some question has been made upon the bill *320of exceptions, whether any question of the sufficiency of the evidence of notice, is properly before this court. But as the testimony is detailed very much at length, and the court say they “ found the facts proved, as stated in the testimony of…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Nickell v. BradshawOregon Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Hughes v. Pacific Wharf & Storage Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Goucher v. Carthage Novelty Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1906
  4. Harr, Secty. of Banking v. EdsallSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  5. Union Wholesale Company v. Bank of DelawareSuperior Court of Delaware · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API