Legal Opinion

Harr, Secty. of Banking v. Edsall

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 11, 1935No. Appeal, 369PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Parker, J.,

The Secretary of Banking of this Commonwealth, acting as receiver of the Bank of Philadelphia and Trust Company, brought this action in assumpsit to recover a balance due on a negotiable instrument from William A. Edsall, the defendant, an endorser. The sole question involved on this appeal concerns the sufficiency of an attempted notice of dishonor to the defendant. The case was tried before a jury and the trial judge submitted to the jury two questions: Was the office of the Individual Family Laundry the place of business of the defendant? Did the endorser know that the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bank of Columbia Ex Rel. Bank of United States v. LawrenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
  2. Chestnut Street National Bank v. EllisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
  3. Stephenson v. PrimroseSupreme Court of Alabama · 1838
  4. Zollner v. MoffittSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  5. United States v. JacobySuperior Court of Delaware · 1905

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Neff v. Tribune Printing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  2. Bell SEC. of Banking v. AndersonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. James Doak, Jr., Co. v. LevySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  4. Decoster v. Brown (Et Ux.)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  5. Bednar v. Colonial Manor Apartment Corp., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Chester County1965

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API