Legal Opinion
Union Wholesale Company v. Bank of Delaware
Superior Court of Delaware
Decided April 25, 1963No. 1200PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Lynch, J.:
Plaintiff, 1 a bank depositor, has sued the defendant bank1, to recover money paid out by the Bank on checks forged by an employee of the Plaintiff.
The case was tried by a Court and Jury on February 6 and 7, 1963, resulting in a jury verdict for the Bank. The Plaintiff filed a motion on or about February 15, 1963, which motion was titled “Motion to Set Aside Verdict and Judgment Thereon and Motion for New Trial Pursuant to Rules 50 and 59”.
A post trial review of the evidence shows there is no conflict in the testimony; each party introduced such testimony as it considered relevant…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Phœnix Bank v. RisleySupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Philadelphia, Baltimore & Washington Railroad v. GattaSupreme Court of Delaware · 1913
- National Dredging Co. v. PresidentSupreme Court of Delaware · 1908
- Wilson v. DerricksonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1961
- Deer Island Fish & Oyster, Co. v. First Nat. BankMississippi Supreme Court · 1933
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Logullo v. JoannidesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1969
- Bank of Delaware v. UNION WHOLESALE COMPANYSupreme Court of Delaware · 1964
- Compania de Aguaceros v. First National City BankDistrict Court, Canal Zone · 1966
- Stephano & Quick v. Twp. of St. Thomas, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Franklin County1985