Legal Opinion

Armour v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided April 23, 1941No. A-9773PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.

The defendant, Martin Armour, was charged jointly with Raymond Pilgrim and Edgar Armour by indictment on April 17, 1939, in Tulsa county, with the crime of robbery in the second degree. Defendant was) granted a severance, was tried in the district court of Tulsa county, convicted, and sentenced to serve a term of two years in the State Reformatory at Granite, from which judgment and sentence he appeals to this court.

The defendant contends that:(1) The trial court erred in overruling, his demurrer to the indictment.(2) The trial court erred in refusing to instruct the jury to acquit the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Simpson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
  2. Hart v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Plemons v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1932
  4. Lumpkin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. Hames v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1933

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Parker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1996
  2. Miller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1992
  3. Fish v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1973
  4. Holleman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1942
  5. Hardesty v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1955

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API