Legal Opinion
Hames v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided March 25, 1933No. A-8492PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChappell, J.
Plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the district court of Oklahoma county of the crime of burglary in the second degree, and his punishment fixed by the jury at imprisonment in the state penitentiary for a period of three years.
The evidence of the state was that defendant and his codefendant, Opal Henson, came to the premises at 1036 Northeast Eleventh street, which property was owned and in the possession of Mrs. Willa Helms, at some time in the afternoon of the day of the burglary, ostensibly to rent the house; that this house was furnished, and that Mrs.…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Fowler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912
- Crawford v. Ferguson, County JudgeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
- Hendrix v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
- Wilson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1931
- Hargis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Sheehan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1946
- Armour v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1941
- Rickman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1940
- Byington v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1961
- Byars v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1934