Legal Opinion

Schwartz v. Weingart

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided April 1, 1935No. 361PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWAN, Circuit Judge.

The question which this appeal attempts to present is whether the alleged bankrupts seasonably moved to dismiss the petition for insufficiency appearing on its face or whether they waived the right to make this obj ection, although their answer reserved it, by obtaining a reference to a master and proceeding to trial before him after he had denied their motion to dismiss. But before the merits of the controversy can be reached we are constrained to consider a question of jurisdiction.

The involuntary petition was filed by the appellants and three other creditors; the order…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Feibelman v. PackardSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. American Baptist Home Mission Soc. v. BarnettCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
  3. Marine Works, Inc. v. GallagherCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1925
  4. Cooney v. DandridgeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1913
  5. Canal Bank & Trust Co. v. BrewerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. King & Howe, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
  2. Bell v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API