Legal Opinion
Cold Metal Process Co. v. American Sheet & Tin Plate Co.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided February 4, 1938No. 4817 and 4906PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FAKE, District Judge.
This is a patent suit in which questions of validity and infringement are directed to five patents, all of which are now owned by the plaintiff corporation. Four of these patents were originally issued to Agram F. Steckel; to wit, No. 1,779,195, No. 1,744,016, No. 1,744,017, and No. 1,-744,018, and the fifth was issued to William C. McBain; to wit, No. 1,881,056. They will be considered here in the order above set out, and references thereto will be by use of their last three numbers only.
Steckel No. T95.
This patent discloses that the original application therefor was…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Altoona Publix Theatres, Inc. v. American Tri-Ergon Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Hailes v. Van WormerSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Grinnell Washing MacHine Co. v. E. E. Johnson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Powers-Kennedy Contracting Corp. v. Concrete Mixing & Conveying Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Electric Cable Joint Co. v. Brooklyn Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Cold Metal Process Co. v. Republic Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1956
- United States v. Cold Metal Process Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1947
- Cold Metal Process Co. v. Carnegie-Illinois Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
- Cold Metal Process Co. v. E. W. Bliss Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1960
- United States v. Cold Metal Process Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1945
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.