Legal Opinion

Karas v. Corning Hospital

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 18, 1999No. Appeal No. 1Published

1Opinion of the Court

—Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Because third-party defendant has failed to brief on appeal the issue whether Supreme Court erred in granting the cross motion of defendants-third-party plaintiffs for common-law indemnification against it, we deem that issue abandoned (see, Ciesinski v Town of Aurora, 202 AD2d 984).

The court erred in granting plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability on the Labor Law § 240 (1) claim. There are issues of fact whether the scaffold was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ciesinski v. Town of AuroraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  2. Felker v. Corning Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Weininger v. Hagedorn & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. In re the Claim of HollandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  5. Mortellaro v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API