Panasonic Communications & Systems Co. v. State, Department of Administration, Bureau of Purchases
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
LIPEZ, Justice.
[¶ 1] Panasonic Communications & Systems Co. (“Panasonic”) appeals from the judgment entered in the Superior Court (Kennebec County, Atwood, J.), pursuant to M.R.Civ.P. 56(c), denying its motion for a summary judgment and granting a summary judgment for the State of Maine’s Department of Administration, Bureau of Purchases (“the State”). Panasonic contends that the trial court erred in ruling that a letter agreement between OASYS, Inc. (“OASYS”), Panasonic, and the State was not a valid contract, and in finding that Panasonic was not a third-party beneficiary of the contract…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Zamore v. WhittenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
- Chapman v. BomannSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
- FO Bailey Co., Inc. v. Ledgewood, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
- Struck v. HackettSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
- Bahre v. PearlSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Rales v. Blasband Ex Rel. Easco Hand Tools, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1993
- Snow v. BE & K Construction Co.District Court, D. Maine · 2001
- Rodrigue v. RodrigueSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997
- Daigle Commercial Group, Inc. v. St. LaurentSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
- GMAC Commercial Mortgage Corp. v. GleichmanDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.