Legal Opinion
Murrow v. Walden
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided November 15, 1923No. 14438PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.
1. The motion to dismiss the bill of exceptions is denied.
2. Under the facts of this case the judge did not err either in striking the plea or in thereafter rendering a judgment in favor of the plaintiff.
3. Not being fully convinced that the bill of exceptions in this case was brought to this court for delay only, the request of the defendant in error that ten per cent, damages be assessed against plaintiff in error ' is denied.
Judgment affirmed.
Broyles, O. J., and Luke, J., concur. W. B. Bennel, J. B. Murrow, for plaintiff in error, cited:
21 Ga. App. 717; 20 Ga. App. 740.
John Henry Poole,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Palmer Brick Co. v. ChenallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Lunsford, Maxwell & Co. v. Malsby & AverySupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- Johnson v. J. S. &. W. H. LatimerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1884
- Hogan v. Brown & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1901
- Montfort v. Americus Guano Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- McIntyre v. Zac-Lac Paint & Lacquer Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
- McIntyre v. Zac-Lac Paint & Lacquer Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1963