Legal Opinion

McIntyre v. Zac-Lac Paint & Lacquer Corp.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 29, 1963No. 39924Published

1Opinion of the Court

107 Ga. App. 807 (1963)

131 S.E.2d 640

McINTYRE

v.

ZAC-LAC PAINT & LACQUER CORPORATION.

39924.

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Decided April 29, 1963.

Rehearing Denied May 23, 1963.

Wilson Brooks, Philip T. Keen, for plaintiff in error.

Noah J. Stone, Hugh W. Stone, contra.

EBERHARDT, Judge.

1. Defendant in error urges that since plaintiff in error recites in the bill of exceptions that he "then and there accepted and herein now [sic] accepts and assigns the same as error" there is no assignment of error and nothing for this court to consider. He urges that this position finds further support in the recital…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Lessee of Ewing v. BurnetSupreme Court of the United States · 1837
  2. Mutual Life Insurance v. DurdenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
  3. Holmes v. Phenix Ins. Co. of BrooklynCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1899
  4. Martin v. MonroeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  5. Phenix Insurance v. ClaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1897

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API