Legal Opinion

O'Neill v. Interurban Street Railway

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1903PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by the defendant, the Interurban Street Railway Company, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Kings County Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Kings on the 15th day of July, 1903, denying the defendant’s motion for a bill of particulars.

1Opinion of the Court

Goodrich, P. J.:

The action is to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have resulted from the negligence of the defendant. The latter appeals from an order denying its motion for a bill of particulars as to the injuries which the plaintiff alleged that she believed were permanent and as to the length of time during which plaintiff was confined to her home.

Cavanagh v. Metropolitan Street R. Co. (70 App. Div. 1) and Curtin v. Metropolitan Street R. Co. (65 id. 610) are authority that under a similar complaint the defendant is entitled to a bill of particulars specifying what injuries…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Steinau v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
  2. Cavanagh v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Williams v. Chattanooga Iron WorksTennessee Supreme Court · 1915
  2. DeRoire v. Lehigh Valley RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
  3. Ferris v. Brooklyn Heights RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API