Legal Opinion

Scania Insurance v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 15, 1896PublishedCited by 11 opinions

JError to the County Court of Arapahoe County.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Campbell

On the 7th of March, 1892, the plaintiff in error, The Scania Insurance Company, insured for one year the furniture and household goods of Mrs. H. Quigley against loss or damage by fire, to the amount of $2,000. Mrs. Quigley was then the sole owner of the próperty, made the application *477for insurance, and paid the premium. Attached to the policy was a provision : “ Loss, if any, payable to Mrs. H. Johnson, as her interest may appear.”

Contained in the policy were the usual provisions, declaring the policy void if the risk be increased by any means within the control of the assured, or if any…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hastings v. . Westchester Fire Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. Hartford Fire Insurance v. OlcottIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Chandos v. American Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Franklin Savings Institution v. Central Mutual Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
  5. Bates v. Equitable InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1870

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Atlas Reduction Co. v. New Zealand Ins.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
  2. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. RuddyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
  3. Prudential Insurance v. German Mutual Life Insurance Ass'nMissouri Court of Appeals · 1933
  4. Conner v. Northwestern National Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  5. Rawl v. American Central Ins.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1913

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API