Legal Opinion
Bilinski v. Keith Haring Foundation, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 6, 2015No. 14cv1085 (DLC)PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
DENISE COTE, District Judge.
Plaintiffs assert that they are owners of Keith Haring artwork and that the actions the Keith Haring Foundation (“Foundation”) and related defendants interfered with the exhibition and sale of their artwork, reducing the value of their property. Keith Haring (“Haring”), who died in 1990, was a prolific artist and social activist whose work responded to the New York City street culture of the 1980s. Plaintiffs bring federal and state antitrust claims, as well as a false advertising claim under the Lanham Act. Plaintiffs also seek relief under New York…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Professional Real Estate Investors, Inc. v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- City of Cincinnati v. Discovery Network, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Katz v. TravelersDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2017
- Walter v. Queens Coll.District Court, E.D. New York · 2019
- Apotex Corp. v. Hospira Healthcare India Private LimitedDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020
- Brock v. LogsdonDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2023
- Bullion Trading LLC v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 2026
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.