Legal Opinion

Fredericks v. Universal Underwriters Insurance

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 17, 1996No. C 930570CV; CA A86413PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

In this declaratory judgment action, plaintiffs seek a declaration that defendant, their insurer, had an obligation to cover their expenses in defending certain lawsuits brought against them. ORS 28.010 et seq. After the complaint was filed, plaintiffs moved for summary judgment. Defendant then filed a cross-motion for summary judgment on the ground that it has fulfilled its obligations under its policy by paying $20,000 of plaintiffs’ defense expenses. The trial court ruled for plaintiffs on all of their claims, ORCP 47 C, and defendant appeals from the resulting judgment. We reverse.

Plaintif…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Hoffman Construction Co. of Alaska v. Fred S. James & Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Jones v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  4. Doe v. American Red CrossOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Sparling v. Allstate Insurance CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ernie Haire Ford, Inc. v. Universal Underwriters InsuranceDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2008
  2. Fontana v. SteensonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  3. Service Lloyd's Insurance Co. v. J.C. Wink, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2005
  4. Sunset Presbyterian Church v. Brockamp & Jaeger, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  5. Bob Lewis Volkswagen v. Universal Underwriters GroupDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API