Legal Opinion
Riger v. L & B LTD. PARTNERSHIP
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided September 16, 1976No. [No. 99, September Term, 1975.]PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEldridge, J.
This is the second time within a year that the constitutionality of the Montgomery County rent control law, Montgomery County Code (1972, 1974 Cum. Supp.), Chapter 29, Article VI, has been before us. In Westchester West No. 2 v. Mont. Co., 276 Md. 448, 348 A. 2d 856 (1975), several landlords attacked the Montgomery County rent control law on so-called “substantive due process” grounds, arguing that no public emergency existed with respect to shortages in rental housing, and that, therefore, the rent control law constituted a deprivation of the landlords’ private property without due process…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Department of Transportation v. ArmacostCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
- Pitsenberger v. PitsenbergerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
- Tyler v. City of College ParkCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
- Roberts v. Total Health Care, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
- Heft v. Maryland Racing CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.