Legal Opinion

Chrome Plating Co. v. Wisconsin Electric Power Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 1942PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFritz, J.

The sole basis of the cause of action alleged by plaintiff in its complaint is that defendant, a public utility furnishing electric power to the general public,—

“recklessly, wilfully and without authorization from plaintiff and without any notice of any kind, nature or description to the plaintiff cut off the power line supplying electric current to plaintiff; . . < that by reason of the reckless and wilful conduct of the defendant . . . plaintiff has been damaged in the said sum of $4,808.24; that the proximate cause of the injury to the drier and the damage to plaintiff was the wilful and…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Highway Trailer Co. v. Janesville Electric Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Murphy v. MartinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Roseliep v. HerroWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Cohn v. NeevesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1876

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Kinzua Lumber Co. v. DaggettOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Holman Transfer Co. v. Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Town of East Troy v. Soo Line Railroad CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1976
  4. Peissig v. Wisconsin Gas Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Reuling v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1950

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API