Legal Opinion
Moffit v. Endtz
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided July 16, 1925No. Docket No. 28PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.
Plaintiff Moffit was injured. The injury was caused by concurrent negligence of Adrian Endtz and Grand Rapids Railway Company. The verdict was $7,500 against Endtz and no cause of action against the company. Judgment was entered on the verdict, which, reviewed on error in this court, was reversed. Moffit v. Railway Co., 228 Mich. 349. The cause came on for second trial in the superior court without a jury.
In an opening statement, counsel for plaintiff said:
“Some question has arisen as to the effect of the reversal in the Supreme Court of the judgment, as to whether that reversal reverses the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Abb v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1902
- McBride v. ScottMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
- Carey v. BilbyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
- Lindsay v. Acme Cement Plaster Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1922
- Blackman v. SimpsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Black v. MartinMontana Supreme Court · 1930
- Haney v. CheathamWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- Cook v. City Transport Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1935
- Fitzcharles v. MayerMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
- Standard Oil Co. v. Y-D Supplies Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.