McBride v. Scott
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Rohnert, J. Case by Joseph McBride against John Scott, Arthur Scott, and Maxwell H. G-rylls (copartners • as John Scott & Co.), Alexander Chapoton, James M. Wood, and others, for injuries caused by the collapse of a building. From a judgment for defendants on demurrer to the replication to their plea puis darrein continuance, plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
The plaintiff brought this suit against a large number of defendants. The defendants demurred to the declaration. Judgment passed for the defendants. The case was appealed to this court, reversed, and remanded. 125 Mich. 517 (84 N. W. 1079). At this stage of the proceedings two of the defendants, Moore and Wiggins, paid to the plaintiff §1,507.68, and were given a release in the following terms:
“ Whereas, the Supreme Court has held that in the various Wonderland cases all the defendants were liable *177upon the allegations in the plaintiff’s declaration; and Whereas, James H. Moore and Enoch W.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ellis v. EssonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1880
- Bloss v. PlymaleWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1869
- Gunther ex rel. Gunther v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1876
- Gilpatrick v. HunterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1844
- Brogan v. HananAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Dwy v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
- American Process Co. v. Florida White Pressed Brick Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1908
- Theophelis v. Lansing General HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 1988
- Hunt v. ZieglerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
- Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. HilligossIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.