Legal Opinion

Skolsky v. Nat'l Auto. & Cas. Ins. Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 11, 1967No. Civ. No. 30422PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtFiles, P. J.

This action against the surety on a release of attachment undertaking resulted in a summary judgment for plaintiff, in the amount of $50,000 plus interest, from which defendant appeals. This is the undertaking which was given to release the attachment in Skolsky v. Electronovision Productions, Inc., ante, p. 246 [62 Cal.Rptr. 91] 2 CIV 30504.

The complaint in the instant action states in substance as follows: In March 1965 plaintiff commenced an action against Electronovision and obtained an attachment of some property of the latter. That property was released pursuant to an undertaking by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stephens v. CadySupreme Court of the United States · 1853
  2. Passow & Sons v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Skolsky v. Electronovision Prods. Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. Curtin v. HarveyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Barrios Co., Inc. v. Indemnity Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1929

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. First v. ArmesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API