Legal Opinion
Janet R. Kerns v. Capital Graphics, Inc., Doing Business as Clarinda Company
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided June 2, 1999No. 98-2479PublishedCited by 103 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURPHY, Circuit Judge.
Janet R. Kerns sued her employer, Capital Graphics, Inc., for discriminating against her on the basis of gender and retaliating against her in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq. and the Iowa Civil Rights Act, Iowa Code §§ 216.1 et seq. The district court granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment, and Kerns appeals. She asserts that the district court erred in granting summary judgment and the defendant’s motion to strike portions of her affidavit and statement of facts. We affirm.
I
At the time relevant here, Janet…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Valerie Harlston v. McDonnell Douglas CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by103 opinions
- Torgerson v. City of RochesterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- Torgerson v. City of RochesterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- Quinn v. St. Louis CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- Ronald J. Fenney v. Dakota, Minnesota & Eastern Railroad Company, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Amicus on Behalf of TheCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
- Sandella S. Spears v. Missouri Department of Corrections and Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.