Rose v. Port Authority of New York and New Jersey
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LEISURE, District Judge.
Pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, defendant Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (“Port Authority”) moves for summary judgment in the instant matter. For the reasons stated below, defendant’s motion is granted in part and denied in part.
BACKGROUND
From April of 1990, to September 15,1995, plaintiff Geraldine S. Rose (“Rose”) worked as an Administrative Assistant with the World Trade Institute of the Port Authority. 1 Rose alleges that from June of 1991, to September of 1995, the time of her termination from employment,…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Janet L. Evans v. Port Authority of New York and New Jersey Angelo Dinome Laura Toole Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, Janet L. Evans v. Port Authority of New York and New Jersey Angelo Dinome Laura TooleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Steven Dezaio v. Port Authority of New York and New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Curtis v. Airborne Freight Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- MacK v. Port Authority of New York and New JerseyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 542 v. Delaware River Joint Toll Bridge CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.