Legal Opinion

Corr v. Braasch

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1981No. 13,298PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PAYNE, Justice.

J. William Corr (Corr), who is a California attorney, filed suit against Richard and Bonita Braasch (Braasches) for damages and specific performance arising out of a real estate purchase agreement. Braasches denied that a contract existed and alleged that if a contract did exist they were entitled to damages from third-party defendant Norman Palmer (Palmer), a licensed real estate broker. Palmer in turn filed a counter-claim against Braasches alleging that he was entitled to a commission on the agreement for sale of property from Braasches to Corr. The court granted…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tatsch v. Hamilton-Erickson Manufacturing Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Polhamus v. RobertsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Pickett v. MillerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Silva v. NobleNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1973

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gallegos v. U.S. Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  2. Leavy v. BNSF Railway CompanyDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2025
  3. MRC Permian Company and Joe Foran v. Three Rivers Operating Company and Three Rivers Acquisition LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API