Legal Opinion

People v. Doyle

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided January 18, 1994No. Docket 148686PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtD. C. Kolenda, J.

On June 26, 1991, defendant was arrested and charged with having, on that date, operated a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor, third offense. MCL 257.625(6); MSA 9.2325(6). He was also charged with being a second-felony offender. MCL 769.10; MSA 28.1082. The effect of that latter charge was to increase the maximum possible penalty for the ouil, third offense, from 5 years’ imprisonment to 7 Vi years’ imprisonment.

On October 8, 1991, defendant filed a motion to quash the supplemental information, contending that continued pursuit of it would constitute an *296inappropria…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Penry v. LynaughSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Butler v. McKellarSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. People v. BewersdorfMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
  4. People v. StevensonMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  5. People v. TuckerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v DoyleMichigan Supreme Court · 1996
  2. People v. StewartMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. People v DoyleMichigan Supreme Court · 1996
  4. People v. DoyleMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API