Legal Opinion

People v Doyle

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1996No. 98809, Calender No. 3PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMallett, J.

We granted leave in this case to determine whether this Court’s decision in People v Bewersdorf,1 is retroactively applicable to conduct that took place before the release of that opinion. We hold that People v Bewersdorf applies retroactively to the present defendant, Mr. Michael Robert Doyle. We reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals and remand this case to the circuit court for further proceedings with regard to the supplemental information.

*96I

A. HISTORY OF PEOPLE v BEWERSDORF

In Bewersdorf, this Court, for the first time, interpreted the relationship between the habitual offender act…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Penry v. LynaughSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Bouie v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. People v. UllahMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Michigan Educational Employees Mutual Insurance v. MorrisMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  3. People v. SextonMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  4. People v. StewartMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. People v. BrownMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API