Legal Opinion

Butler v. McKellar

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 5, 1990No. 88-6677PublishedCited by 534 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Rehnquist

Petitioner Horace Butler was convicted and sentenced to death for the murder of Pamela Lane. After his conviction became final on direct appeal, Butler collaterally attacked his conviction by way of a petition for federal habeas corpus. Butler relied on our decision in Arizona v. Roberson, 486 *409U. S. 675 (1988), decided after his conviction became final on direct appeal. We have held, however, that a new decision generally is not applicable in cases on collateral review unless the decision was dictated by precedent existing at the time the petitioner’s conviction became final. Penry v.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Engle v. IsaacSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by534 opinions

  1. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Lockhart v. FretwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Dickerson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Gray v. NetherlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

529 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API