State Ex Rel. Road Commission v. Wood
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CROCKETT, Chief Justice:
The State Road Commission took from defendants by eminent domain proceedings an entire 7.23-acre piece of vacant land situated between 300 and 400 ’North and between 1200 and 1350 West in Cedar City, for construction of the new 1-15 freeway. The jury placed the value at' $24,582 and-rendered a verdict for that amount.
The Commission appeals, contending that the trial court erred in admitting evidence concerning sales and values of certain prop-' erties not sufficiently similar to defendants” property to provide a proper basis for adjudicating its value.
In 1956 the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Engineering Commission v. PeekUtah Supreme Court · 1953
- City & County of Honolulu v. Bishop Trust Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1965
- Weber Basin Water Conservancy District v. WardUtah Supreme Court · 1959
- State Ex Rel. Road Commission v. General Oil Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1968
- State Ex Rel. Road Commission v. JacobsUtah Supreme Court · 1964
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Merced Irrigation District v. WoolstenhulmeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Utah State Road Commission v. FribergUtah Supreme Court · 1984
- City of Hildale v. CookeUtah Supreme Court · 2001
- Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City v. Mitsui Investment Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1974
- Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City v. BarrutiaUtah Supreme Court · 1974
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.