Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Road Commission v. Wood

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1969No. 11193PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROCKETT, Chief Justice:

The State Road Commission took from defendants by eminent domain proceedings an entire 7.23-acre piece of vacant land situated between 300 and 400 ’North and between 1200 and 1350 West in Cedar City, for construction of the new 1-15 freeway. The jury placed the value at' $24,582 and-rendered a verdict for that amount.

The Commission appeals, contending that the trial court erred in admitting evidence concerning sales and values of certain prop-' erties not sufficiently similar to defendants” property to provide a proper basis for adjudicating its value.

In 1956 the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Engineering Commission v. PeekUtah Supreme Court · 1953
  2. City & County of Honolulu v. Bishop Trust Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Weber Basin Water Conservancy District v. WardUtah Supreme Court · 1959
  4. State Ex Rel. Road Commission v. General Oil Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1968
  5. State Ex Rel. Road Commission v. JacobsUtah Supreme Court · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Merced Irrigation District v. WoolstenhulmeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Utah State Road Commission v. FribergUtah Supreme Court · 1984
  3. City of Hildale v. CookeUtah Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City v. Mitsui Investment Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City v. BarrutiaUtah Supreme Court · 1974

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API