Legal Opinion
Nautilus Insurance Co. v. Vuk Builders, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided November 28, 2005No. 05 C 3941PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
MORAN, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiff Nautilus (“Nautilus”) brought an action seeking a declaratory judgment resolving the obligation it owes to defendants Vuk Builders, Inc. (“Vuk”), Duk Hee Rhee (“Rhee”), LaSalle Bank (“LaSalle”), Lincoln-Belmont Hotel Corporation (“Lincoln”), Ike & Rick’s Place, Inc. (“Ike & Rick’s”), L & W Sales, Inc. (“L & W”), and Capitol Indemnity Corporation (“Capitol”) to defend and indemnify defendants in two state court negligence actions. On September 12, 2005, defendants Lincoln, Ike & Rick’s and L & W moved to strike plaintiffs…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Gibson v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. PeppersIllinois Supreme Court · 1976
- Bankers Trust Company, Cross-Appellee v. Old Republic Insurance Company, Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hankins v. Maryland Casualty Co./Zurich American Insurance Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2012
- Amherst Country Club, Inc. v. Harleysville Worcester InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2008
- Willmar Development LLC v. Illinois National Insurance CoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Willmar Development, LLC v. Illinois National InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2010
- Amherst Country Club v. HarleysvilleDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.