Uhlir v. State Farm Insurance
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Patricia Ann Blackmon, Administrative Judge.
{¶ 1} Appellants, Clarence and Julie Uhlir, appeal the trial court’s denial of their motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, or in the alternative, additur or a new trial. The Uhlirs assign the following error for our review:
I. The trial court erred and abused its discretion in denying plaintiffs’ motion for J.N.O.V., or in the alternative, additur, or in the alternative, a new trial.
{¶ 2} Having reviewed the record and pertinent law, we affirm the decision of the trial court. The apposite facts follow.
{¶ 3} On August 31, 2001, the Uhlirs…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bailey v. AllberryOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
- Hardy v. OsbornOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
- Farkas v. DetarOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
3Cited by3 opinions
- Decapua v. Rychlik, 91189 (4-30-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
- Favors v. BurkeOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- Berardo v. Felderman-SwearingenOhio Court of Appeals · 2020