Legal Opinion

Uhlir v. State Farm Insurance

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 20, 2005No. 85819PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Patricia Ann Blackmon, Administrative Judge.

{¶ 1} Appellants, Clarence and Julie Uhlir, appeal the trial court’s denial of their motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, or in the alternative, additur or a new trial. The Uhlirs assign the following error for our review:

I. The trial court erred and abused its discretion in denying plaintiffs’ motion for J.N.O.V., or in the alternative, additur, or in the alternative, a new trial.

{¶ 2} Having reviewed the record and pertinent law, we affirm the decision of the trial court. The apposite facts follow.

{¶ 3} On August 31, 2001, the Uhlirs…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bailey v. AllberryOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Hardy v. OsbornOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Farkas v. DetarOhio Court of Appeals · 1998

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Decapua v. Rychlik, 91189 (4-30-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. Favors v. BurkeOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. Berardo v. Felderman-SwearingenOhio Court of Appeals · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API