Legal Opinion

Hardy v. Osborn

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 12, 1988No. 54260PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarkus, P.J.

The plaintiff appeals from the denial of her motion for new trial, after a judgment in her favor for allegedly inadequate damages. She argues that the jury mistakenly listed her special damages instead of the total damages in their interrogatory answers for her personal injury action. However, the jurors’ affidavits to that effect cannot contradict the written interrogatory answer, so we reject that contention. Nevertheless, we unanimously conclude that the jury’s interrogatory answer and the resulting judgment were contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence. Consequently, we recognize…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. v. Astorhurst Land Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Stevens v. Cessna Aircraft Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1986

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Pearson v. WasellOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Walsh v. ChanHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Ford v. SekicOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. Riedel v. Akron Gen. Health Sys., Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County2018
  5. Uhlir v. State Farm InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API