Legal Opinion

National Electrical Annuity Plan v. Henkels and McCoy, Incorporated

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided September 29, 2022No. 3:18-cv-13701Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION NATIONAL ELECTRICAL ANNUITY PLAN, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 18-13701 HENKELS AND MCCOY, INC., Defendant. / OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AND GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT In an amended complaint filed January 31, 2019, Plaintiff National Electrical Annuity Plan (“NEAP”) alleges that Defendant Henkels and McCoy, Inc. (“H&M”) failed to make required Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”) contributions pursuant to the terms of the parties’ collective bargaining…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace, and Agricultural Implement Workers of America (Uaw), and Local 134, Uaw v. Yard-Man, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
  3. No. 99-3279Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  4. Courson v. Bert Bell NFL Player Retirement PlanDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. Baptist Memorial Hospital v. MarsawDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API