Courson v. Bert Bell NFL Player Retirement Plan
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
CINDRICH, District Judge.
This is an action for judicial review of certain eligibility determinations made under employee benefit plans covered by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. Sections 1001, et seq. (“ERISA”). On March 31, 1999, the court entered an order granting defendants’ Motion For Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 12) and denying plaintiffs Motion For Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 22). This memorandum opinion sets forth the court’s reasons for the order.
I. Background
Plaintiff Stephen P. Courson (“Cour-son”) was drafted by the Pittsburgh…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- George W. Mitchell v. Eastman Kodak CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Hullett v. Towers, Perrin, Forster & Crosby, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Richard H. Heasley, Sr. And Doris G. Heasley v. Belden & Blake CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Patterson v. Hughes Aircraft Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Doyle v. Nationwide Ins. Companies & Affiliates Employee Health Care PlanDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
- Daniel Johnson v. Bert Bell/pete Rozelle Nfl Player Retirement PlanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
- Cloud v. The Bert Bell/Pete Rozelle NFL Player Retirement PlanDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2022
- Daniel Johnson v. Bert Bell/PeteCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
- Morris v. National Football League Retirement BoardDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.